Know of an officer-involved shooting we missed, or have information on one we’ve covered? Contact us at dylan@readfrontier.com.

Past years
2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018

February

Date: Feb. 4
Department(s) involved: Bixby Police Department.
Shot: Christopher Veal, 55.
Race: White.
Fatal: No.
Armed: Yes, with a gun. 
Details: Bixby Police responded to an early-morning domestic dispute and said Veal eventually fired “multiple rounds” toward officers, who returned fire, striking him. Veal was hospitalized, released and later booked into jail in Tulsa.

Date: Feb. 1
Department(s) involved: Oklahoma Highway Patrol, U.S. Marshals
Shot: Preston Lange
Race: White
Fatal: No
Armed: Yes, with a gun.
Details: Lange was being arrested for allegedly removing his ankle monitor after being released from prison. While authorities were attempting to serve the warrant, Lange allegedly shot at them. Officers returned fire, striking Lange, who survived.

January

Date: Jan. 20
Department(s) involved: LeFlore County Sheriff’s Office
Shot: Unreleased.
Race: Unreleased. 
Fatal: No.
Armed: Yes, with a gun.
Details: Deputies arrived at a home in LeFlore County after being notified of a domestic disturbance. The suspect fled the home, authorities said, eventually crashing his vehicle. He exited with a firearm, deputies said, and was shot. He survived.

The post Shot by Shot: Tracking Oklahoma police shootings in 2024 appeared first on The Frontier.

The more people who read our stories, the easier it is to create that impact. Unfortunately, like every media company, social media is no longer a reliable way to reach new readers, putting us in the position of seeking new ways to promote our journalism.

So this year we’re launching The Frontier Texting Club. You sign up by texting “Frontier” to 918-393-7284 and you’ll receive an update every time we post a new story. You can also sign up on the below form.

Additionally, readers can message us at the same number with feedback or news tips. 

Sign up to get text message alerts whenever we publish a new story

The post Sign up to get text message updates when we publish a story appeared first on The Frontier.

A special legislative session called by Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt will begin on Monday. Stitt hopes lawmakers will pass a quarter-cent income tax cut, though that appears unlikely. 

Leadership in the Oklahoma House of Representatives has indicated they’ll pass the cut, calling it another step toward leading Oklahoma to zero income tax, but the Senate’s leader says Stitt hasn’t shown a detailed plan, and they won’t vote in favor. Senate President Pro Tem Greg Treat told The Frontier lawmakers could opt to take up the tax cut during the regular session, which starts Feb. 5.

Oklahoma’s current top income tax rate is 4.75%. Stitt’s proposed cut would drop the top rate to 4.5%. The Oklahoma Legislature last passed an across-the-board quarter-percent tax cut in 2021. 

On this episode of Listen Frontier, we talk to House Speaker Charles McCall and Treat to get their takes on the upcoming special session. 

Treat told The Frontier he wasn’t “cutting off the possibility” of taking up the cut during the regular session.

“We’re just cutting the possibility of wasting taxpayer dollars in the meantime,” he said, noting it costs $20,000 a day to keep the full Senate in session and “double that” for the House of Representatives.

“We’ll entertain tax policy, including tax cuts, during the regular session if we’re convinced of it,” Treat said. “But having a special session a week prior to the regular session is just a waste of resources, tax money, and it’s just political theater.”

Stitt has criticized Treat’s unwillingness to consider the tax cut during the special session.

“All I asked was for Senator Treat to put a quarter-point tax cut up for a vote. The Senate is refusing to do what 65% of Oklahomans support: cutting taxes. If anything is a waste of taxpayer money, it is the refusal of Senate leadership to give Oklahomans a well-deserved pay raise,” Stitt said in a post Thursday on the social media platform X. 

The proposed quarter-cent tax cut would save the average Oklahoma family about $100 a year, Treat said. McCall said the cut would be another step toward taking the state to zero income taxes – a path Treat said the state is “already on.”

Treat said the Senate’s hesitance is that Stitt “hasn’t enunciated a plan,” and is basing the ability for the state to absorb a tax cut on revenue estimates that won’t be finalized until February. Those numbers will then be used by lawmakers to vote on the “real budget,” Treat said. A quarter-cent tax cut would cost the state about $250 million, Treat said.

Last year, between December and February, revenue estimates declined by $611 million, Treat told The Frontier.

“The Governor claims we know the numbers, the time is now,” Treat said. “But we don’t know the numbers and we’re not sure the time is now.”

McCall told The Frontier the House of Representatives will pass Stitt’s plan on Wednesday, the earliest day possible.

“We don’t have a problem voting on it, and I believe it passes (in the House),” he said. “The question is the Senate.”

Treat said he wants to make sure any change to the state’s tax rate “is sustainable.”

“I want to make sure that whatever we do tax policy wise … doesn’t jeopardize the future of Oklahoma,” he said.

This is Listen Frontier, a podcast exploring the investigative journalism of the Frontier and featuring conversations with those on the frontlines of Oklahoma’s most important stories. Listen to us Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher. 

To donate to The Frontier and help support our efforts to grow investigative journalism in Oklahoma, click here.

The post Listen Frontier: Oklahoma Senate leader says he’ll consider a tax cut, just not yet appeared first on The Frontier.

Read more about Jamerson’s case.

Tulsa has a history of high-profile convictions that have been overturned. Oklahoma ranks 10th per capita in the country in overturned convictions with 45 since 1989, according to data from The National Registry of Exonerations. Sixteen of those overturned cases happened in Tulsa. 

• Sedrick Courtney was convicted in 1995 of armed robbery after a woman was blindfolded and beaten during a break-in of her apartment in Tulsa. The victim told police she believed it was Courtney who had attacked her. A Tulsa police laboratory analyst testified that hair found at the scene was similar to Courtney’s. The Innocence Project began requesting access to DNA evidence from Courtney’s case in 2007, but Tulsa Police said it had been destroyed. When evidence was eventually located and tested, it ruled out Courtney as the source. His conviction was overturned in 2012 and he later won an $8 million settlement with the city of Tulsa for his wrongful conviction.

• Michelle Murphy’s murder conviction was vacated in 2014. Murphy was 17 years old when she found her infant son, Travis, stabbed to death in her kitchen in 1994. She was charged with her son’s murder after giving police a false confession, according to the Innocence Project. Prosecutors told Murphy’s attorney that blood from the scene belonged to her son, but later told jurors that test results from the blood could not rule out Murphy as suspect. The jury convicted her based on the blood evidence and a recording of a juvenile neighbor who suffered from mental health issues and had hanged himself by the time of the trial. The neighbor told police he had looked through Murphy’s windows and saw her son in a pool of blood and Murphy with blood on her arms. A judge sentenced her to life without the possibility of parole in 1995. She was freed in 2015 after DNA testing on the blood revealed it belonged to an unidentified male. Prosecutors dismissed Murphy’s case and a judge ruled her innocent. 

• Malcolm Scott and De’Marcho Carpenter’s murder convictions were vacated in 2016. Scott and Carpenter were convicted in the 1994 killing of 19-year-old Karen Summers and the wounding of two others. A third man, Michael Wilson, was also arrested after police found him trying to hide a pistol that had been used in the shootings. Wilson eventually told police he gave the gun and ammunition to Scott and Carpenter and hid the gun for them. Scott and Carpenter were sentenced to life plus 170 years in prison in 1995. In 2014, just before his execution on an unrelated murder conviction, Wilson told investigators he had actually killed Summers and blamed it on Scott and Carpenter. A Tulsa County judge vacated Scott and Carpenter’s sentences in 2016, declaring them “actually innocent.”

• Corey Atchison’s murder conviction was vacated in 2019. Atchison, who is Malcolm Scott’s half-brother, was convicted for the1990 shooting and killing 29-year-old James Lane. Atchison, who was 19 at the time, said he and his friends heard the gunshots, saw Lane in the street, and urged others to call 911. Atchison said he tried to help the dying man. He stayed at the scene for hours that night, before police searched his vehicle and found nothing illegal. Months later, a 16-year-old named Doane Thomas implicated Atchison as the shooter in a phone call with detectives. Thomas later said detectives coerced his identification of Atchison. Two other suspects, Ben King and 15-year-old Demacio McClendon, also later implicated Atchison, and claimed to have been threatened and coerced by police. Atchison was sentenced to life in prison in 1991. A Tulsa County judge vacated Atchison’s conviction in 2019, ruling it was a “fundamental miscarriage of justice” and that eye witnesses had been coerced to testify against Atchison. The judge said: “Without those witnesses, I don’t think a jury would have found Mr. Atchison guilty of this crime.”

The post A look back at Tulsa’s history of overturned convictions appeared first on The Frontier.

Two men approached Dubbs’ car and one held a gun, telling the second man to watch her while he went inside to rob the Tulsa diner where Dubbs and her boyfriend worked. Just 16 and newly pregnant, Dubbs told police she was terrified as the lookout man pulled her from the car, pressed what she thought was a stun gun to her neck and raped her behind a dumpster.

Minutes later, the robber emerged from the diner’s back door as Dubbs lay on the ground, pretending she fainted. Both men ran off into the darkness. 

Whoever robbed the store that night, May 24, 1991, was never found. A Tulsa Police Department detective wrote that the robbery investigation “bogged down” and the file was turned over to the sex crimes unit.

Dubbs, the only witness who reported seeing the rapist, told police she thought she could describe her attacker. 

By late July, police prepared a report for prosecutors alleging that William Henry Jamerson, a 22-year-old former busboy at the diner, Ma Bell’s, was the rape suspect. Jamerson was arrested, charged, tried and convicted in a whirlwind of three months. 

Trial transcripts show prosecutors based their case on two pieces of evidence: testing on semen recovered during Dubbs’ sexual assault exam they said put Jamerson in a “narrow class” of people who could have been the rapist, as well as Dubbs’ supposed identification of Jamerson, including in a police photo lineup. 

Advanced DNA testing wasn’t widely used in 1991, but a chemist testified during the trial that Jamerson was among the 20% of people who are “non-secretors,” meaning their blood type is not detectable in their semen. Police said tests done on the rape kit showed the semen belonged to a non-secretor. Jamerson’s attorney opted not to cross examine the chemist, telling jurors he feared the testimony would only confuse them.

Jamerson’s trial lasted only two days. His attorney, who lost his license to practice law in 1995 for “disciplinary reasons” according to the Oklahoma Bar Association, did not give an opening statement and did not call any witnesses. Jurors took about three hours to come back with a guilty verdict and Jamerson was sentenced to 34 years on three felony counts. 

It was a verdict that Jamerson, who was 22 years old when he was sent to prison, has spent the last 30 years trying to undo. 

For decades, he begged the Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office in letters and court motions to find and test the rape kit for DNA. Tulsa police said each time that the sexual assault examination evidence had been destroyed. 

But those repeated claims by police, including under oath in a 2020 court hearing, were wrong. The evidence police insisted for more than two decades had been destroyed was instead found last year in a police property storage facility. Once that evidence was tested, Jamerson was excluded as being the source.

Jamerson spent nearly 24 years in prison before being released in 2015. He has to register as a sex offender until 2025. Jamerson’s long quest to clear his name is detailed in a 56-page petition filed in August by attorneys Dan Smolen and Allen Smallwood seeking to throw out his conviction. 

Prosecutors are pushing back against Jamerson’s efforts. Dubbs described the rape as only taking place for a matter of minutes and never testified the assailant ejaculated, so the sample not belonging to Jamerson doesn’t exclude him from being the rapist, they say. Prosecutors also argue Dubbs’ alleged identification of Jamerson as her attacker in 1991 is still evidence of guilt.

Police records state Dubbs picked Jamerson out of a photo lineup. But now, Dubbs, who still lives in the area, told The Frontier she didn’t remember seeing a photo lineup. It was Tulsa Police, Dubbs said, who told her Jamerson was her rapist.

The Frontier does not identify victims of sexual violence without their consent. In multiple interviews, Dubbs consented to The Frontier publishing her name.

“I was 16, I was pregnant, I was scared … I just did what Vicki (Sousa, the prosecutor) told me,” Dubbs said. “I got on the stand and did what they said and answered the questions. It’s always bothered me.

“Things don’t add up to me. It’s been eating me alive ever since.”

Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler, as is his custom with an ongoing case, declined to be interviewed for the story. He also declined to view The Frontier’s recorded interviews with Dubbs. 

After two decades in prison, Jamerson cuts a soft-spoken, humble profile. He said he’s worked to overcome the anger that filled him years ago at being accused and imprisoned for a crime he says he didn’t commit. He said he wants to clear his name while his mother, Donna, 81, is still alive.

“I kept fighting because I knew I didn’t do anything wrong,” Jamerson said.

Smolen notes Jamerson’s case didn’t happen in a vacuum. Police also repeatedly insisted DNA evidence had been destroyed in the case of Sedrick Courtney, convicted in 1995 of armed robbery after a woman was blindfolded and beaten during a break-in of her apartment in Tulsa. 

She told police she believed it was Courtney who had attacked her. A Tulsa police laboratory analyst testified hair found at the scene was similar to Courtney’s. As in Jamerson’s case, it was too early for advanced DNA testing. Courtney was convicted based on the victim’s identification, including from a photo lineup, and testimony about the recovered hair.

The Innocence Project began requesting access to the DNA evidence from Courtney’s case in 2007, but Tulsa Police said the evidence had been destroyed. It was eventually located, and when tested, ruled out Courtney as the source. His conviction was overturned and he later won an $8 million settlement against the city of Tulsa for his wrongful conviction.

Oklahoma ranks 10th per capita in the country in overturned convictions with 45 since 1989, according to data provided by The National Registry of Exonerations. Sixteen of those wrongful convictions occurred in Tulsa, data shows. 

Years of denials, then a surprising twist 

In 1991, advanced DNA techniques now taken for granted in courtrooms were not widely used. Instead, prosecutors in his case relied on serology, the study of blood. At the time of Jamerson’s trial, DNA testing was in its infancy. So investigators would look within the semen to see if blood had been secreted, and then use that information to determine blood type.

Jamerson’s conviction rested on two things: Dubbs’ alleged identification of Jamerson and the serology results done on semen collected during her sexual assault examination. Trial transcripts show prosecutors told jurors the results of the tests couldn’t confirm Jamerson as the source, but they couldn’t rule him out, either.

During closing arguments, prosecutor Vicki Sousa told jurors the case was air-tight.

“In some cases you only have circumstantial evidence,” Sousa said. “And in other cases, you have just the eyewitness or victim’s testimony. Ladies and gentlemen, in this case, you have both.”

Reached by phone, Sousa declined to be interviewed by The Frontier.

As DNA testing became more prevalent and reliable, Jamerson pleaded from prison for someone to test the sample, convinced it would rule him out as a suspect. The Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, which provides legal services for people in the criminal justice system who can’t afford an attorney, even obtained a grant in the years after Jamerson’s conviction to test DNA in questionable convictions. 

But no matter who asked for the sample, they were met with the same roadblock: The Tulsa Police Department claimed to have destroyed it. 

In 2001, Jamerson asked lawyers for the Indigent Defense System to test the rape kit, but they informed him it was impossible.

“As you already know, the Tulsa Police Department destroyed whatever evidence they had in their possession,” Indigent Defense attorney Kathleen Smith wrote to Jamerson. 

Jamerson wrote to Tulsa Court Clerk Sally Howe-Smith in 2002, asking her to check for evidence, but none was found. 

The Indigent Defense System wrote to Jamerson in 2014 that the DNA Forensic Testing Program had been discontinued. But the letter gave Jamerson a lifeline, something that would connect him with the attorney who made a crucial breakthrough in his case.

“However,” wrote Indigent Defense investigator Kim Marks, “I found a document from the Tulsa Police Department’s legal advisor in which the status of the evidence in your case …(is) addressed.”

The document was a 2001 memo from the Tulsa Police Department’s legal advisor at the time, telling the Indigent Defense System that the rape kit Jamerson was seeking had been in an evidence building known as the Trenton Facility, but was destoyed via court order in 1995.

In 2016, one year after being released from prison, Jamerson traveled to Smolen’s office, holding a nearly 20-year-old story from the Tulsa World. Smolen, a civil rights attorney whose firm has a history of taking on law enforcement misconduct, immediately took an interest in Jamerson’s case.

In the 2001 news article, then-Tulsa Police Chief Ron Palmer told the paper evidence from 10 cases, including Jamerson’s, had not been destroyed, and in fact, remained in the department’s possession “untouched.”

The article stated two Indigent Defense attorneys were investigating the evidence, which was “held at a city facility at 105 N. Trenton Ave.”

Smolen said he had worked on other cases where supposedly destroyed or missing evidence had been found, so Jamerson’s assertion that his innocence could be proven if they could locate the DNA wasn’t outlandish. But it was mostly Jamerson’s patient and calm demeanor that drew Smolen in.

Over the next four years, Smolen would repeatedly ask for Tulsa Police to produce the rape kit, which he was convinced still existed. And for years, Tulsa Police would tell him it had been destroyed. 

At least once, those assurances even conflicted with what Tulsa police said internally. A Tulsa police captain emailed city attorneys in 2016 that “this is 25 years old but I believe the items listed on the receipt may still be in the property room.” 

Yet police continued to insist to Smolen that the rape kit and other evidence had been destroyed, including in an evidentiary court hearing in November 2020. 

In 2022, after years of getting nowhere, Smolen convinced a judge to let him search for the evidence. But when he actually gained access to the Tulsa Police property room that summer, he faced a different problem – he had no idea how to find what he was looking for. 

Closely watched by property room staffers and officers, Smolen spent hours that day looking for the rape kit and other evidence, growing increasingly disappointed as it appeared it was no longer there. Eventually he found a lead: The back of an original property receipt listing evidence retained in Jamerson’s case showed an as yet-unseen item identified as “fibers.” 

By 3 p.m., having blown past lunch, Smolen was informed the people supervising his search needed to take an hour break. Smolen was buoyant, he said, having found a new lead for the first time in years. But the possibility existed that it would turn out to be another dead end. 

“I was like, ‘this is going to give me the opportunity at least to go in front of a judge and argue I should be able to go back and look for more stuff,’” Smolen said.

When he returned to the property room, he said the vibe had shifted. 

“When we walked back in … it’s a completely different feeling in the room,” Smolen told The Frontier. “I was like ‘Did you guys find it?’”

The item, a manilla envelope, had been found in a dry police storage facility located elsewhere in Tulsa. It wasn’t the rape kit, but it was something better. They had located slides containing biological evidence from the rape kit, material that had already been identified as containing semen.

Months later, the sample was sent to a forensic testing laboratory in Virginia. The lab responded via email on April 13, 2023, saying the results excluded Jamerson as the source of the sample. 

Smolen told The Frontier he anticipated the test results would end the case, and Jamerson would finally have his sentence vacated. But prosecutors took a different approach. 

The Tulsa County District Attorney’s office response maintains that the DNA test results do not qualify as a reason to vacate Jamerson’s conviction. 

“The lack of Jamerson’s DNA from the latest round of testing does nothing for him,” a prosecutorial filing states. “It does not overcome a conclusive identification of him made by GD (Dubbs).” 

‘A remarkable resemblance’

In an Oct. 31 response to Jamerson’s petition to vacate his conviction, prosecutors continued to maintain that Dubbs identified Jamerson as her attacker when she chose him from a photo lineup. 

The Tulsa County District Attorney’s response states a detective presented Dubbs with a photo lineup and included a form with Dubbs’ signature saying she chose Jamerson’s photo from it. The evidence gathered by law enforcement, however, did not include a recording of Dubbs identifying Jamerson from a lineup or the actual photos from that lineup. 

Dubbs testified during Jamerson’s trial that she viewed a photo lineup of five people and picked Jamerson out of the series of photos. She told the prosecutor she had no doubt Jamerson was her rapist.

But police records from the case show how detectives, not Dubbs, came up with Jamerson as their prime suspect before a photo lineup. 

Because witnesses described the robber and rapist as Black men and there were suspicions the robbery could have been an inside job, a store manager, not present on the night of the crimes, gave police the names of three current and former restaurant employees who were Black, including Jamerson. 

Though no witnesses had named Jamerson as a suspect and some named another man they thought was responsible, police nonetheless pulled Jamerson’s photo taken during an earlier encounter and added it to the case files on the Ma Bell’s rape and robbery. 

Two months after the robbery, Det. David Witt was brought into the investigation to create a composite drawing of the rape suspect. The composite was created based on an interview with Dubbs, police records state.

“Witt … was not certified and had no formal training as a forensic artist. The drawing he created is not a forensic drawing,” Jamerson’s petition states.

According to police records, the robbery detective assigned to the case saw Witt’s drawing of the rape suspect and “noticed the resemblance of that composite to … a standard police mug shot of William Henry Jamerson.” The robbery detective, J. Hunter, shared the composite and photograph of Jamerson with Det. Deborah Daniels, who agreed there was a “remarkable resemblance” between the two, police records state.

Jamerson’s petition claims officers created the composite drawing, then informed Dubbs that it had allowed them to identify Jamerson as the attacker. “TPD never disclosed to the District Attorney’s Office that they – not Dubbs – had identified Jamerson as the assailant,” Jamerson’s petition claims.

During Jamerson’s trial, the state did not call either Hunter or Daniels – who investigated the case and were integral in identifying Jamerson – as witnesses to testify about that process. The state did enter a “stipulation” outlining that Daniels would, if called, testify about collecting bodily fluids from Jamerson after his arrest. Prosecutors now say they aren’t sure “why the State did not call” the detective responsible for the alleged photo line up, “or include anything about the photo lineup” in its stipulation about Daniels’ testimony.

In interviews with The Frontier, Dubbs said while she recalled helping Witt draw a composite sketch of her attacker’s face, she did not recall participating in a photo lineup.

“I don’t remember any lineup, I don’t think so, and I remember everything,” Dubbs said.

Dubbs said she had never met Jamerson and that she first heard his name from police. “They said they had … found the guy that they believe is the guy that did it and that his name was Jamerson,” she said.

She said she described what her attacker looked like to police, pointing to the composite drawn two months after the attack, and doesn’t know how police came up with his name. 

“I gave them the face I saw and they’re the ones who later on was like ‘Oh this is who this is.’’’ Dubbs said police told her “his identity was a perfect match” with the composite sketch. “But they could be lying to me, I don’t know.” 

‘No Negroid hairs so far!’ 

While police told Dubbs they had identified her attacker, some evidence pointed to another possible suspect. But records show that exculpatory information wasn’t turned over to Jamerson or his previous attorney before trial.

Tests from the Tulsa Police lab on Dubbs’ clothing from that night found numerous pubic hairs from a Caucasian person. Jamerson said those tests were among hundreds of pages of documents the prosecutor didn’t share with his attorney.

Despite finding no hairs from a Black assailant, records show prosecutors and police were clearly looking for them during their bid to tie Jamerson to the rape.

A Tulsa police crime lab examiner’s notes about tests on Dubbs’ clothing from that night state that Sousa called the examiner on Sept. 23, 1991 – about a month after Jamerson was arrested. 

“She said that she needs to know if there are any negroid hairs in order to obtain known samples from the suspect!” the examiner’s notes state. 

The next day, the examiner’s notes state: “No negroid hairs so far!”

In a sworn statement filed in the case, Sousa stated while she doesn’t have detailed memories, “it was my practice to provide defense counsel with all police reports in my possession as an (assistant district attorney) assigned to a case.” 

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1963 that the government’s failure to disclose evidence favorable to a criminal defendant and that could determine guilt or punishment is a violation of the 14th Amendment’s right to due process. Withholding evidence can be used to overturn convictions in some cases. 

‘I kept fighting’

During the nearly 24 years he spent in Oklahoma prisons, Jamerson waged a lonely quest to prove his innocence. He spent most of his time in law libraries, writing appeals and letters to anyone who might help.

While those appeals were turned down, he struggled to rise above the everyday horrors of prison life. Jamerson saw the aftermath of a teen cellmate’s suicide by hanging and the fatal stabbing of a prison cafeteria worker. He was unable to grieve with his family after his father and brother died.

Yet through those years, he rejected multiple chances to win early release through parole, a process that would have required him to admit guilt in the case. 

“I ain’t going to accept a crime that I didn’t do,” he said. 

When freedom finally came in 2015, Jamerson said he remained determined to prove his innocence, even after serving out his time. He had to register as a sex offender, making it nearly impossible to find a steady job to support himself. He said he can find temporary employment, but it almost always ends as soon as his employers learn about his criminal past. 

His memorabilia from days as a standout basketball player had been removed from a display at Central High School. If his conviction is vacated and he’s found legally innocent of the crime, he could be eligible for compensation from Oklahoma’s Wrongful Conviction Fund. But the payout is capped at $175,000 and it could take years to be compensated.

Most of all, Jamerson said he wants to prove his innocence and clear his name to make life easier for his mother, who never wavered in her support for him during her son’s two decades in prison. 

“She always tells me ‘I’ll be glad to have this over with,’” he said.

Jamerson said he has worked for years to overcome his anger at how the case played out. 

While watching Dubbs’ video interview with The Frontier, in which she expresses doubts about his conviction, Jamerson shook his head and exhaled. 

“I didn’t lose no hope … I just stayed focused,” he said.

Dubbs said it’s important to remember that even if Jamerson’s conviction is vacated, she is also a victim in the case. She said she was a traumatized, pregnant teen who did what police and prosecutors told her to do.

“I feel like they put a story together … I’m not here to convict people that aren’t guilty. I was 16, I was pregnant. I was scared.” She said if she had been older and more confident to stand up for herself, the outcome might have been different.

“It’s a very emotional thing to sit there with a jury and (be) pregnant and being so young. And your parents are sitting there and … the lawyers are asking you, ‘If you could see his penis again could you identify it.’” 

The possibility that she might have been wrong about who attacked her that night is deeply upsetting to her. 

“I am damaged and still a victim. Now I get to live with the fact that my rapist wasn’t caught.” 

The post DNA evidence casts doubt on Henry Jamerson’s rape conviction after 24 years in prison. Prosecutors are fighting efforts to clear his name. appeared first on The Frontier.

Original story: After reporting alleged abuse, a former Greer Center staffer found flyers saying she was available for sex acts

The Oklahoma Department of Human Services continued to refer clients to a troubled center for people with developmental disabilities for months after reports of systemic abuse first surfaced. A former Greer Center staff member said coworkers retaliated against her after she reported the allegations.

Frontier reporter Kayla Branch has been covering the story for months, and on this episode of Listen Frontier, she speaks with us about her investigation, what she learned during her reporting, what developments there have been recently, and where the case is headed.

This is Listen Frontier, a podcast exploring the investigative journalism of the Frontier and featuring conversations with those on the frontlines of Oklahoma’s most important stories. Listen to us Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher. 

To donate to The Frontier and help support our efforts to grow investigative journalism in Oklahoma, click here.

The post Listen Frontier: Multiple investigations launched into alleged abuse at Oklahoma facility for people with developmental disabilities appeared first on The Frontier.

“You’ve been around how long now?” the person asked. 

I was surprised to realize the answer to that question was “ almost nine years.”

This will probably not surprise you, but launching a new media outlet is not an easy task. I remember sitting around with the rest of the staff, planning for our launch, trying to figure out what might go wrong. We were worried about so much. Would anyone read us? Would anyone answer our calls? Would we be taken seriously?

I have a distinct memory of sitting in a coffee shop with the original Frontier squad — Bobby Lorton, Ziva Branstetter, Cary Aspinwall and Kevin Canfield — and making a plan not to worry about those questions anymore. I think Kevin even mentioned the movie Field of Dreams at one point. 

“If you build it, they will come.”

We decided as a group that those questions were out of our control. What was in our control was the journalism we produced. We figured at the end of the day, if we did our jobs, the readers would follow. 

For the first few weeks, I was afraid that if I opened phone calls with “This is Dylan Goforth with The Frontier,” people would respond “This is who with what?” So, instead, my phone calls began this way: “This is Dylan Goforth, I work with Ziva Branstetter.” Everyone knew Ziva, so this worked.

I was heartened to find that after a few short weeks, people seemed to know who we were. People responded to our phone calls and emails quickly and we could see our stories taking off on social media. It didn’t take long before we began to feel truly established.

It’s hard to believe that was almost nine years ago. We’ve grown since then, from a team of four covering Tulsa, to a team of six and growing — you’ll hear more on that soon. And now we cover the entire state. But what hasn’t changed is our commitment to doing impactful journalism.

My first editor once gave me a quiz. He asked me if I thought he was a “reporter’s editor or an editor’s editor.” Meaning, in a disagreement, would he take my side or my editor’s side?

It was a trick question. “I’m a reader’s editor,” he said. “I’ll always do what’s best for the reader.”

That line has stuck with me ever since. Every story we work on, we ask ourselves how we can make it better for our readers. I’ve heard it said that journalism creates change. That’s true, in a sense, but really, I think journalism sparks change. I’ve never changed anything myself. 

But I’ve written stories that have resulted in firings, criminal charges, policy changes and arrests, among other things. Those things happened, not because of me, but because readers took an interest in what I wrote about and demanded change. That’s the true power of journalism.

I promise you our next nine years will look a lot like our first, only better. We’re committed to telling the best, most impactful stories we can. I love our staff, I love how varied they are as people. We have reporters who are gym fiends, who hunt and fish, who do karate (ask me who and I might tell you,) among other things. But what they all have in common is a desire to inform Oklahomans, to give you the knowledge you need to make change happen.

The relationship between a news outlet and the community they serve is symbiotic. You all rely on us to find the wrongdoing, to find the people being harmed by unjust systems or laws. And we rely on you to spread the word and help everyone else discover what we’ve uncovered.

Without you, none of what we do works.

That’s why I’m asking you today to consider becoming a Frontier supporter. We’re a nonprofit, and all your donations are tax-deductible. 

Now through Dec. 31, donations to The Frontier will be matched by a collaborative fundraising movement called NewsMatch that supports independent, public-service journalism. We can earn up to $50,000 in matched donations.

This is the most crucial time of the year for us. We know that to continue to serve Oklahoma, we need to continue growing. Every year, my biggest regret is the stories we couldn’t tell, because we didn’t have the bodies or time to throw at them. 

Together we can help make Oklahoma better, one step at a time. Thanks for your support.

The post Without you, none of what The Frontier does works appeared first on The Frontier.

Ebony Johnson replaced former superintendent Deborah Gist in September.

It was a chaotic start – TPS, the state’s largest school district with more than 30,000 students, was under the threat of takeover by the state board of education, as state Superintendent Ryan Walters targeted Gist and TPS with criticism and ultimatums.

Gist eventually stepped down, Johnson was appointed, and tensions cooled slightly.

“I feel like right now, leadership is needed in a way that it’s never been needed before, and I’m honored to do that,” Johnson told The Frontier.

On this episode of Listen Frontier, Johnson speaks with us about her first few months on the job, her background in education, the threats facing TPS, as well as her plans for the district’s future.

This is Listen Frontier, a podcast exploring the investigative journalism of the Frontier and featuring conversations with those on the frontlines of Oklahoma’s most important stories. Listen to us Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher. 

To donate to The Frontier and help support our efforts to grow investigative journalism in Oklahoma, click here.

The post Podcast: A conversation with interim Tulsa Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Ebony Johnson appeared first on The Frontier.

In March, Walters announced the creation of an email address — dubbed Parent Watch — where concerned parents could notify the Oklahoma State Department of Education about materials in school classrooms and libraries. The Frontier filed an open records request for emails people sent to the Parent Watch account. 
Some people signed the state email account up for news alerts from food delivery services, newsletters for LGBTQ+ news, sex toys, and a Peppa Pig Theme Park in Florida. One person emailed the lyrics to the songs Teenagers by My Chemical Romance, Mambo No. 5 by Lou Bega and Ice Ice Baby by Vanilla Ice.

Read the emails sent to OSDE

Part 1 | Part 2

Many sent links to news stories detailing sexual misconduct by religious figures and Republican lawmakers in Oklahoma and across the country. One person emailed a lengthy portion of the script to the Bee Movie, a 2007 film written by Jerry Seinfeld.

The Frontier reviewed more than 4,000 pages of emails the public sent to the Parent Watch account during the first week of its existence but found only one complaint from a concerned parent that appeared to be submitted in good faith. 

That complaint was about the novel Highly Suspicious and Unfairly Cute by Talia Hibbert. The person said the school librarian recommended the book to her daughter, who is in junior high school. But her daughter stopped reading the book because she “didn’t feel comfortable with the content.”

The book description reads: “‘Highly Suspicious and Unfairly Cute’ follows two main characters Bradley and Celine who were once best friends, but are now essentially enemies. The two can barely stand to be around each other.” The emailer said the book contained sexual references and bad language.

It’s unclear if the State Department of Education or Walters followed up with the parent about the complaint. The person’s name and email address are redacted and the school where the book was allegedly kept was not named in the email, and Walters, State Department of Education spokesman Dan Issett and Chief Policy Advisor Matt Langston did not respond to multiple requests for comment. 

Even seemingly serious responses eventually veered into parody. One person wrote to say their son was being banned from chanting “Let’s go Brandon,” a derogatory phrase aimed at President Joe Biden, at his high school.

“We will win,” the person wrote before giving away the gag. “We cannot be defeated by intelligence.”

Since taking office in January, Walters has cemented himself as the state’s top-elected culture warrior. One of his first moves was to support revoking teaching certifications for two Norman teachers who opposed a state law limiting instruction on race and gender. He sought to ban books, ranted about a Chinese language course, told U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona that “shouldn’t be allowed” in Oklahoma, and pushed schools to teach content from the conservative media outlet PragerU. He spoke at a national Moms For Liberty summit, an organization the Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled a hate group, and called for the U.S. Department of Education to be disbanded. He called teacher unions “terrorist organizations,” and successfully pushed for Tulsa Public Schools Superintendent Deborah Gist to leave office while teasing a possible state takeover of the district.

People wrote to the Parent Watch email account to vent about Walters’ remarks and policies.

While running for office, Walters repeated an urban legend about schools putting kitty litter in classrooms for students who identified as cats. The story is a myth, but one emailer pounced on the opportunity to turn it into a joke as well.

“If you had to pick, would you rather (put) Pamela Anderson’s head on a Garfield body or Garfield head on Pam Anderson’s body,” they asked. “This question is no more invalid than people asking about litter boxes in schools.”

Many wrote to express concerns about banning some books from schools.

“I am extremely worried about the idea that schools would restrict/ban books from their classrooms,” one person wrote. “This is censorship, and it is not part of our American values.”

Other emailers targeted Walters directly.

“Ryan Walters is a disgrace to Oklahoma and I pray he resigns in disgrace,” one person wrote.

“Ryan Walters needs to be watched. What an unhinged creep,” another wrote.

Some emailers bypassed the jokes or insults in favor of pointed questions.

“I have serious concerns about Tulsa Public Schools and the constant attacks from our state superintendent on it,” one person wrote. “These kids are pawns in a fabricated political scheme from the right.”

Many called for the Bible to be barred from classrooms because of its depictions of sex and violence.

“It promotes the following,” one person wrote, “Incest, Murder of and by multiple characters, Adultery, Genocide, Child sacrifice, Polyamorous relationships, Sex trafficking, Human trafficking, Depictions of sex/body parts, Swear words.”

The post Ryan Walters asked for tips on inappropriate material in Oklahoma schools, people sent jokes and jeers appeared first on The Frontier.

Karen Keith worked as a television reporter before moving to the local chamber of commerce and later a post in the mayor’s office. She now serves as one of three Tulsa County Commissioners.

Next up? Possibly the most powerful position in local city government.

On this episode of Listen Frontier, Keith talks with us about her past, why she wants to be mayor, and what she thinks she can accomplish.

This is Listen Frontier, a podcast exploring the investigative journalism of the Frontier and featuring conversations with those on the frontlines of Oklahoma’s most important stories. Listen to us Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher. 

To donate to The Frontier and help support our efforts to grow investigative journalism in Oklahoma, click here.

The post Listen Frontier: Karen Keith enters the Tulsa mayoral race appeared first on The Frontier.